Eloking

Menarik juga bila baca perkongsian brother Nabel ni. "Belajar 20 tahun. Kerja 40 tahun. Bebas 5–10 tahun. Kemudian mati. It's a scam." Bila dibaca sekali lalu, macam biasa saja. Tapi bila direnung lama-lama, rupanya kita memang sedang hidup ikut skrip itu. Saya tidak pasti brother Nabel maksudkan apa, namun saya perhatikan inilah kehidupan yang kebanyakan dari kita lalui. Sejak kecil kita disusun untuk percaya hidup mesti begini, Sekolah. Kejar result. Masuk universiti. Cari kerja elok. Beli rumah. Kumpul aset. Tua boleh keluar KWSP. Pergi masjid, belajar agama. Kemudian barulah “tenang”. Dan entah kenapa, agama selalu diletakkan di hujung sekali. Terpisah-pisah dari kehidupan. Satu kebenaran yang kita semua perlu akui. Dalam tak sedar, kita banyak memisahkan agama dari kehidupan kita. “Nanti dah tua aku fokus.” “Nanti bila hidup dah stabil.” “Nanti bila anak dah besar.” Padahal tiada siapa pernah janji kita akan sempat sampai ke fasa “nanti”. Tak ada siapa mampu janjikan kita berjaya hidup sampai esok hari. Mungkin sekejap lagi Allah jemput kembali. . . . Saya selalu terfikir, kalau hidup ini sekadar ulang rutin yang sama, bangun, kerja, penat, tidur, apa bezanya kita dengan mesin? Sedangkan Allah sendiri bertanya kita dalam surah Al Mu'minun ayat 115, أَفَحَسِبْتُمْ أَنَّمَا خَلَقْنَاكُمْ عَبَثًا وَأَنَّكُمْ إِلَيْنَا لَا تُرْجَعُونَ “Apakah kamu menyangka Kami menciptakan kamu dengan sia-sia?” Ayat ini bukan sekadar pertanyaan. Ia teguran buat diri saya dan kita semua. Allah tidak bertanya kerana Allah tidak tahu. Allah bertanya kerana kita manusia terlalu lama lupa. Seolah-olah Allah berkata, “Kamu benar-benar fikir hidup ini sekadar makan, kerja, penat, tidur… lalu mati?” “Kamu sangka usia yang Aku pinjamkan ini tidak akan dipersoalkan?” Kadang kita hidup terlalu sibuk, sampai tak sedar kita sedang bernafas tanpa tujuan yang jelas. Kita bangun pagi kerana kerja. Kita kejar kerana tanggungjawab dunia. Kita letih kerana rutin. Semuanya kerana kita lakukan apa saja bukan kerana untuk mendapat redha Allah semata. . . . Bila kita lihat sirah, kita sedar Rasulullah tidak mentarbiyah generasi yang biasa-biasa. Mereka adalah orang biasa sama seperti kita, yang tidak memilih hidup yang biasa-biasa. Bilal bin Rabah Seorang hamba berkulit hitam. Tiada harta, tiada kedudukan di mata manusia. Di mata dunia, dia hanyalah manusia kelas paling bawah. Namun ketika diseksa di tengah padang pasir, dadanya ditindih batu besar, lidahnya tetap basah menyebut, “Ahad… Ahad…” Bilal boleh saja memilih hidup biasa-biasa.Mengaku kufur agar seksaan berhenti. Tetapi dia memilih hidup luar biasa. Kerana imannya tahu, hidup ini hanya sekali, dan ia terlalu mahal untuk dijual demi kebahagiaan sementara. Allah mengangkat Bilal hingga suaranya menjadi azan yang pertama bergema di langit Madinah. Dunia tidak pernah menjanjikan kemuliaan, tetapi Allah memberinya. Lihat pula kehidupan Mus‘ab bin ‘Umair, anak muda paling kaya di Makkah. Pakaiannya mahal. Hidupnya mewah. Namun bila Islam masuk ke hati, semuanya dilepaskan. Akhir hidupnya, kain kafan pun tidak cukup menutup tubuh.Tetapi namanya kekal hidup hingga hari ini kerana perjuangan dalam nak menegakkan Islam. Mereka bukan malaikat. Mereka manusia sama saja seperti kita. Bezanya cuma satu, Mereka tidak meletakkan Allah di tempat yang terakhir dalam kehidupan. Mereka jelas tujuan mereka diciptakan dan untuk apa mereka hidup di dunia ini. . . . Hari ini mungkin kita selalu bertangguh. “Nanti aku dah pergi umrah, Aku nak tutup aurat ” “Nanti aku dah pencen, bolehlah taubat.” “Nanti bila dah tak sibuk dengan kerja aku belajar faham Quran.” Sedangkan ramai orang tidak sempat sampai ke “nanti”. Hidup di dunia ini cuma sekali. Sekali Allah beri nafas. Sekali Dia beri peluang. Sekali kita diuji di dunia ini. Maka terlalu rugi kalau usia yang singkat ini dihabiskan hanya untuk jadi orang biasa-biasa. Bukan biasa pada dunia, tetapi biasa pada ketaatan. Tak apa hidup sederhana. Tak apa tak dikenali. Asalkan bila kita pergi nanti, kita bukan orang yang biasa-biasa. Hiduplah sebagai hamba yang apabila meninggalkan dunia, meninggalkan legasi iman, amal dan manfaat untuk ummah. Syahirah Omar 22/01/2026 Syahirah Omar on FB

Caritanya , 3 bulan lepas sipulan ni suh ak isi borang kerja dia , dia malas nk isi guna phone , ak mati mati ckap x nak, sbb apa.. sbb ak thu nnti mmg ak kena balik , iaitu dipersalahkan or dituduh something. Pagi ni , betul betul kena. Lepas anak tidur ak ak pon kluar la bilik duduk diruang tamu dengan harapan nak rehat smbil tgok phone jap , sipulan tu tgh buat report sales dia tu lah, mcm biasa mmg sial punya company , weekend x weekend kalau dan dia nak ukah jugak la buka laptop berejam , mmg betul 2 sial kau rgm haprak almond. Dh la mulut mcm cibal . Asyik nak suh sipulan tu berhnti tuni tuni . Oh haritu kau xde org nk kerja kau hire dia , skrg bru bbrp bulan kerja x de training sgt kau expect org dh jadi expert yg trpaling expert . Ak GERAM dia ni . Berbalik cerita tu , sipulan suh ak isi borang tu, ak ckp xnk , then paksa lagi smpai ak rse kesian . Then ak tolong la . Buka laptop adobe tu plk tak le nk edit, x le nk buat apa apa except kau ambil free trial , then sipulan ni suh ak amik , dia ckp amik je la, link plk dgn touch n go . Ak ckp xyh la mcm bhya je , nnt kan dia tarik duit , tapi dia paksa jgk suh amik , OK . nk dijadikan cerita x le nk guna pon adobe tu lepas amik free trial sbb smua feature kene. Download dulu n makan masa yg agak lama tau , last last balik ke whatsapp guna phone edit la aku ni satu satu sbb nk tolong , pastu siap semua , manis mulut “terima kasih ap semua” oklah . Pastu ak ad pesan igt tu unsubscribe balik jgn biar je , ak igtkan dia dgr nasihat ak , rupenya x . 2 - 3 minggu lepas tu , balik kerja cpt 2 buka laptop mse ak tgh sibuk msk kat dapur . Duk blebe ckp nak unsubscribe adobe sbb adobe tarik duit dh kt tNG . Dap 👊 mmg kejadah betul la manusia ni , msti ak kene nnti , oh dia duk dkt sejam dlm bilik keluar 2 ckp x jumpa , x pandai xthu . SIAL ! ak dh la letih layan anak masak nk agkt baju dkt luar lagi , suh plak aku settle , ak pon tolong la cri 2 jumpa la cara macam mana nak cancel ,sbelum tu dia dh logout ak suruh dia login balik sbb dia x save kt google password tu , Dia login then duduk blakang ak sbb nak tanya kat mana jumpa button cancellation tu , ak pon tunjuk la satu , depan dia ak cancel then siap buang permission to debit dkt touch n GO. Okelah ak igt , tibe pagi td dlm pkul 2:30pg ak kluar nk rehat jp kat ruang tamu tkut ggu anak ak kalau buka lampu, tup tup ak dituduh x cancel elok elok !!!! Dia ckp smpai kena 350rm dlm adobe tu tp diaorg x dpt tarik skrg , dia tkut nnt kalau dia top up dlm tNG dlm amaun mcm tu habis la duit , SIAL LA BETUL KEKADAH ANAK HARAM NI, Kau yg paksa ak bt kerja kau , kau yg nak sgt subscribe , kau yg x igt nak cancel , ak yg tolong kau cancel . AKU YG DIPERSALAHKAN sdgkan ak cancel tu depan mata kau , siap pergi email tng minta refund balik duit kau yg kena tarik tu !! HANAT BETULLAH JANTAN MACAM ! Kau stress kerja kau cmpur baur smua uli 2 kau bawak balik problem kau dgn RGM BODOH KAU TU ! Pastu bila ak bagi nasihat kau x nk dgr ! Kau nk apa sIAL ! Skrg twist plk crita , pastu x nk dgr bila ak ckp kau punca at the first place kau nak sgt subscribe , ckp itu belik tang kesini , plus lagi ayat kesian ayat keletihan . APA KAU IGT KAU JE LETIH STRESS NAK MAMPUS , kau cuba duduk dkt rumah jaga anak msak jaga rumah, MEMANG AK CAKAP LA , kau layan isteri kau mcm ni sbb tu hidup kau asyik jumpa org 2 yg layan kau jahat 2 je , chenhuk alwim then now almond muka kentang tu ! Nah kau !!! PDAN MUKA ! Ak kalau bercerai dengan sial ni , oneday . Aku mmg lesap x kan bagi dia jumpa anak , dgn si mortua ak tu xkerja duduk keras je dkt luar ngeri dgn laki baru , xnk weh tolong jaga cucu , ad juga faedah boleh jgk ak rehat ke kerja ke , ni 24 jam anak dgn ak , ak postpartum depression ak heal sdri, ak burnout , ak heal sdri , ak sakit bahu sbb menyusu ak than smpai skrg , sbb hutang bertimbung nak myusah dia upah org mngurut pon x smpai hati , mggu lepas x than sgt smpai pinjam duit anak , at this point pon still sakit bahu , YA ALLAH engkau shj yg tahu . MENDERITA BETUL LAH HIDUP & kenal dgn fmily ni , betul 2 SIAL hidup ak . Dlu mak dgn nenek narsisis, skrg hidup dgn suami narsisis plak , fmily in law x habis 2 berdengki dgn ak sbb jealous tgok layanan laki ak yg pura pura terpaling misali & sayang aku depan diaorg . Buat 2 takut bini la . YA ALLAH SESUNGGUHNYA HAMBAMU INI LETIH . Nak hidup tenang ya Allah nak bahagia nak ada duit melebihi yg ak inginkan , nak suami yg baik hati budi . AMIN.

After 3+ years grinding in the SaaS space, I can confidently say: traditional SaaS is dying. The era of “build a dashboard, charge $29/mo, pray users log in every week” is over. Churn is brutal, acquisition costs are insane, and users are tired of yet another tool they forget about after 30 days. What’s replacing it? **AaaS – Agent-as-a-Service**. Instead of selling software, you’re selling autonomous agents that actually *do the work* for your customers. They run 24/7, make decisions, execute tasks, and deliver results without constant human babysitting. That’s the shift everyone’s sleeping on. A few months ago I decided to stop fighting the old SaaS model. I went all-in on agents: * Added proper MCP (Multi-Chain Planning) so the agent can break down complex goals into executable steps across multiple tools/workflows * Implemented smart scheduling and orchestration so agents run reliably on their own timelines * Made them truly proactive instead of reactive The result? My MRR jumped to **£1,760 ($2,380)** — and it’s growing fast with almost zero extra support work. Why this works so well: * Customers pay more because they’re buying outcomes, not logins * Retention is dramatically better (agents keep delivering value even when the user is on vacation) * You can charge premium pricing because you’re replacing hours of human work * Competition is still early — most “AI tools” are just fancy wrappers around ChatGPT **The future is clear:** In 2–3 years, most successful “SaaS” companies won’t be SaaS at all. They’ll be platforms where customers deploy specialized agents that handle entire workflows autonomously. Some strategies that helped me make the jump: 1. Stop thinking in features. Start thinking in agent capabilities and measurable outcomes. 2. Build reliable scheduling and memory systems early — this is table stakes for real agents. 3. Focus on multi-step reasoning (MCP) instead of single-prompt responses. This is what separates toys from actual products. 4. Price based on value delivered (time saved, revenue generated, tasks completed) rather than seats or users. 5. Make your agents observable and auditable so customers trust them with important work. The old SaaS playbook is getting stale. If you’re still building another dashboard or CRM clone in 2026, you’re already behind. Agent-as-a-Service is the new meta. The people who embrace it early are going to eat everyone else’s lunch.

After 3+ years grinding in the SaaS space, I can confidently say: traditional SaaS is dying. The era of “build a dashboard, charge $29/mo, pray users log in every week” is over. Churn is brutal, acquisition costs are insane, and users are tired of yet another tool they forget about after 30 days. What’s replacing it? **AaaS – Agent-as-a-Service**. Instead of selling software, you’re selling autonomous agents that actually *do the work* for your customers. They run 24/7, make decisions, execute tasks, and deliver results without constant human babysitting. That’s the shift everyone’s sleeping on. A few months ago I decided to stop fighting the old SaaS model. I went all-in on agents: * Added proper MCP (Multi-Chain Planning) so the agent can break down complex goals into executable steps across multiple tools/workflows * Implemented smart scheduling and orchestration so agents run reliably on their own timelines * Made them truly proactive instead of reactive The result? My MRR jumped to **£1,760 ($2,380)** — and it’s growing fast with almost zero extra support work. Why this works so well: * Customers pay more because they’re buying outcomes, not logins * Retention is dramatically better (agents keep delivering value even when the user is on vacation) * You can charge premium pricing because you’re replacing hours of human work * Competition is still early — most “AI tools” are just fancy wrappers around ChatGPT **The future is clear:** In 2–3 years, most successful “SaaS” companies won’t be SaaS at all. They’ll be platforms where customers deploy specialized agents that handle entire workflows autonomously. Some strategies that helped me make the jump: 1. Stop thinking in features. Start thinking in agent capabilities and measurable outcomes. 2. Build reliable scheduling and memory systems early — this is table stakes for real agents. 3. Focus on multi-step reasoning (MCP) instead of single-prompt responses. This is what separates toys from actual products. 4. Price based on value delivered (time saved, revenue generated, tasks completed) rather than seats or users. 5. Make your agents observable and auditable so customers trust them with important work. The old SaaS playbook is getting stale. If you’re still building another dashboard or CRM clone in 2026, you’re already behind. Agent-as-a-Service is the new meta. The people who embrace it early are going to eat everyone else’s lunch.

Hey so I am new to elden ring (20+ hrs) I have defeated two main boss i think and some evergael bosses. I currently have access to limgrave, the accademy and the red area ( forgot its name). So I want to know how can I make a good build especially dex build because I like using this bloodhound fang. Ik i should explore more to get items and build myself but I am kinda annoyed by how unbalanced by armour is.. like can I improve that rn or should I wait for new areas which has better loot. I am sorry but I am kinda overwhelmed by the upgrading system in this game but I am having fun so I would like to know what more can I improve in build. Thank you for reading:)

I know this might not be for everyone, but I wanted to make something really fun for my new niece whose parents are hardcore counter-strike nerds 😆 I designed each of the squares myself and used the blank squares as a chance to try out different stitches. My friend hand dyed all the yarn, it's all in 10 ply. This was such a fun project, never did. I think I'd be duplicate stitching a deagle onto a child's blanket but here we are.

Help a sis out ok. Sorry for the long read. I drive an Iriz 2017 model. Love that car but there’s one thing that I couldn’t figure out. From time to time, my car can literally stopped functioning out of the blue, mid driving and all these symbols will appear. I can still paksa / move the car at a super slow snail pace to go to the emergency lane and while doing that the engine will roar kuat nak mampus and dia mcm jerking sikit. If this bullshit happens, my AC also tak function. I can still start my car but it just wont move kalau the symbols appeared. I will have to wait a bit tepi jalan and on off my car until the symbols are gone and it will move back normally but sometimes it will happen again and again in one day. Few times i brought my car to different bengkel to figure out. Cucuk comp and all and they still can’t find out what the hell is wrong with my car. Service on time samo. Check gearbox pun ok je. Two workshop said my gearbox are fine. Fuse box pun check ok je. Timing belt, fuel injector, cvt oil, valve gasket, battery baru tukar last year (just listing out what i changed in case it would help) I also noticed, this will usually happen whenever i parked my car under the sun? Idk why. I’d say 3/5 times will jadi if my car kena jemur lama under the sun. Anyone here with iriz facing same issue? Can help me to point what i need to check for my next visit? For now it’s not happening for quite some time, but usually when it happens it can be either once in a week or 2-3 times a week. After that elok tkda hal until it decides to give me an attitude again. Sekian, terima kasih.

TL;DR:  * volt egyszer egy [Fidesz.hu](http://fidesz.hu) weboldal és médiatár, ahol a 2010-es kormányváltást megelőző és azt követő évekből 12 ezer videófelvételt lehetett megtekinteni Fideszes politikusok mindenféle nyilvános szerepléséről: szinte az összes TV- és rádióinterjú, sajtótájékoztatók és minden más nyilvános szereplésről készült videófelvétel, ami felkerült ide szöveges összefoglaló cikkel együtt, hogy könnyen visszakereshető legyen bármi * ez egészen 2024 nyaráig elérhető volt egy titkos linken, ami 2024-ben valamiért eltűnt. Vajon kinek és miért lett útban hirtelen ez a felbecsülhetetlen értékű archívum? * Sajnos rábasztak, mert valaki még időben lementette a teljes tartalmat és egy jobban használható webes felületet készít hozzá :) * Ez a videótár-tükrözés eredetileg belső használatra készült egy nagyobb készülő projekt részeként, ami a NER 16 évének szeretett volna emléket állítani, ezzel szerettem volna a kampányhajrában én is egy kicsit hozzátenni a NER elpusztításához - sajnos ez a technológiai bonyolultsága miatt néhány hónapot csúszik, ezért úgy gondoltam, hogy az archívumot így kicsit félkész állapotában külön is érdemes lehet közkinccsé tenni, hátha valaki talál még benne érdekességeket áprilisig. Egy érdekes anomáliára lettem figyelmes nemrég: eltűnt az [archiv.fidesz.hu](http://archiv.fidesz.hu), ami a [Fidesz.hu](http://fidesz.hu) 2007 és 2013 között létező rendes weboldalának archivált verziója volt.  A 2007-ben készült oldal egy igazi időkapszula a Fidesz legaktívabb ellenzéki éveiből és a NER hajnalából, ahol szinte minden Fideszes politikus összes megszólalását meg lehetett találni videós formában. Az oldal fennállása alatti években közel 12 ezer médiafájlból álló gyűjtemény jött létre, és a videók/hanganyagok többségéhez szöveges leirat is készült, így elég könnyű volt visszakeresni bármilyen korábbi megszólalást. Fun fact: 2007 és 2010 között én is a videóarchívumon dolgoztam, ezért is emlékeztem rá, hogy milyen felbecsülhetetlen értékű tartalom van felhalmozva ezen az oldalon. 2013-ban aztán a Fidesz egy új weboldalt készített (egy sokkal ocsmányabbat, mint ami előtte volt) a régi oldal pedig archiválva lett - ekkor jött létre az [archiv.fidesz.hu](http://archiv.fidesz.hu), ahol ugyan keresni már nem lehetett, és az elavult Flash alapú videólejátszó se működött már, de ha tudtad, hogy mit kerestél, akkor dátum alapján átlapozva az archívumot továbbra is meg lehetett találni a régi felvételeket és megfelelő formátumba konvertálva használni is lehetett ezeket.  Egészen 2024 nyaráig (a Wayback Machine-on még megtekinthető a 2024 május végi állapot: [https://web.archive.org/web/20240530223604/http://archiv.fidesz.hu/index.php](https://web.archive.org/web/20240530223604/http://archiv.fidesz.hu/index.php)) amikor történt valami, és egyszer csak ez az archívum szőrén-szálán eltűnt. Vajon kinek és miért jutott eszébe a 11 éve ott levő archívumot megsemmisíteni anélkül, hogy egy új rendszerben elérhetővé tették volna a felvételeket? Arra nem foghatják, hogy szűkös a szerverkapacitás, vagy túl nagy munka lett volna, mert én ezt a házi hobbiszerveremen pár automatizált script segítségével megcsináltam csak úgy szorgalmi feladatként egy hétvége alatt… Így utólag: szerencsére, mert ennek köszönhető, hogy ez az eltüntetett archívum ma is megvan :)  Lehet egyébként, hogy pont ez is állhat a törlés mögött, miután észrevették, hogy valaki gőzerővel menti az archívumot? Végülis nekem is gyanús lenne, ha az általam üzemeltetett szerveren egy hétvége alatt százezres nagyságrendben kapna kéréseket egyazon IP címről, ráadásul az useragentben (a böngésződ verzióját és egyéb információkat a szerver felé is jelentő szöveges adatcsomag) “MOCSKOS FIDESZ” szöveg szerepelne :) Na, de ha tényleg ez az ok, akkor miért azután kell törölni, miután a robot már 0000001-től 9999999-ig végiglapozta sorszám alapján az összes létező cikket és a hozzájuk kapcsolódó néhány száz gigabyte-nyi videót? Ráadásul kétszer, mert az első verzióban egy bug miatt hibásan kerültek a saját adatbázisba a videó-cikk kapcsolatok, ezért egyszerűbb volt újraindítani a 3 napig tartó műveletet, mint valahogy kiszűrni és javítani a téves adatokat. :) A lényeg: a saját adatbázis elkészült, a 12 ezer videófelvétel mai, korszerűbb formátumba lett konvertálva és saját szerveren biztonságba lett helyezve a 132 ezer szöveges cikkel együtt egy új felületen - [https://media.kemo.hu](https://media.kemo.hu) \- hogy egyszerűen kereshetőek, lejátszhatóak és feldolgozhatóak legyenek a régebbi anyagok. Még nincs teljesen kész, dátumok és egyebek néhol rosszul jelennek meg és egyéb kisebb problémák itt-ott még akadnak, de úgy általában használható a dolog. Amennyiben egy videóhoz a videó tartalmát leíró cikk is társul (a legtöbb videóhoz készült ilyen) akkor a kereső a szöveg alapján megtalálja a cikket is a videóval együtt (lásd a csatolt screenshoton), így már mostani állapotában is sokkal hatékonyabb keresést tesz lehetővé, mint az eredeti weboldal, a legnagyobb készülő fejlesztés viszont még ezt is fokozza: egy mesterségesintelligencia-alapú feliratozó rendszer automatikusan időkódolt leiratot készít a videókról, így a videó tartalma az elhangzott szöveg alapján is kereshető, a videó adatlapján az egyes mondatokra kattintva egyszerűen az adott mondatra lehet ugrani. Ez az AI-felirat tesztjelleggel már le lett futtatva és ki is próbálható ezen a felvételen: [https://media.kemo.hu/media\_details?id=2413](https://media.kemo.hu/media_details?id=2413)  A következő fejlesztés pedig az lesz, hogy ilyen kijelölt mondatokat gyűjteménybe rendezve gyakorlatilag össze lehet vágni videókat akár videóvágói tudás nélkül is. Ezzel a rendszerrel a cél az, hogy - már egy kicsit a 2026-2030 közötti időszakra készülve - segítsük az internet kollektív emlékezetének ápolását, hogy ne merüljenek feledésbe a NER legnagyobb ellentmondásai és hazugságai és hogy a Fidesz soha a büdös életben ne tudjon visszatérni a hatalomba. Én is készülök ezekből egy nagyobb horderejű, kisebb technológiai mérföldkőnek számító összefoglalóval (eredetileg a választás előtt terveztem közzétenni, sajnos most már kicsi az esély, hogy időre elkészüljön - ezért is teszem közkinccsé az archívumot, hogy hátha más még talál benne bármi érdekeset, ami a választásig felhasználható) mert a választók memóriája sajnos véges és nem árt, ha egy helyen egy egységes, könnyen fogyasztható és megjegyezhető módon dokumentáljuk az elmúlt 16 évet az utókor számára is.  Az oldalról a videók simán jobb klikkel letölthetők és forrásmegjelöléssel szabadon felhasználhatók.

News Junkie? Things just don't update fast enough for you? I’ve been working on a small research experiment that attempts to measure how narratives move through the news cycle. The system continuously collects headlines from a large set of sources and analyzes them at regular intervals. Every 60 minutes it produces a short report describing what changed in the narrative landscape during that period. The goal is not to summarize the news, but to detect changes in narrative momentum — for example: • themes that suddenly accelerate • topics that emerge or fade • clusters of stories that begin appearing across multiple sources The live output can be seen here: https://preceptress.ai This is part of a broader exploration into whether narrative shifts can be measured in a systematic way. One question I’m particularly interested in is whether changes in narrative momentum sometimes appear before they are reflected in prediction market probabilities. Prediction markets translate information into prices. If narrative shifts can be detected early, they might provide a useful signal for studying how information propagates before markets fully incorporate it. At this stage the project is simply an exploratory AI experiment. There are no accounts, subscriptions, or signups — it’s just an attempt to observe whether narrative movement can be measured in a meaningful way. I’d be interested in hearing whether people who follow prediction markets think signals like this could be useful, or whether markets already absorb this kind of information immediately. ⸻ Is traditional MSM just not keeping you up to date in the nano-minutes between news events? This may be for you.

Goal is to make ranch for Sikia to walk around and sleep in and watch via player while that make choices on how to train feed rest or fight with monsters. Finished the Monster So far Gonna Rig and Animate then place inside Godot. Did some photobash/paintover art to get vibe of what i wanted to model and paint in blender gonna need to make it all work in godot in lil bit over next month or so then got alot of flowers/waterfalsl/trees/grass to paint over runic tomb stones for game. i tried not doing symetrical but it felt like lesser ff11 look for somereason and teeth i dont know if i should make more detail or color contrast? once again tho the goal is FF11-ish style but more painterly and its for a MonsterRancher/FF12 strategy monster breeding tournament fighter where u raise at the ranch Stats/Skills and fight in the tournament til you reach master and big bad four. i had to repaint the monste rliek 6 times cause i kep clicking off occlusion for some reason and be like...what... any whoot let me know if any old school Jrpg monsters themes you;d like to see or attmept for ya to raise and fight other monsters with in future. I got a list. This on is Gremlin + Rabah (ff11) + Bengal Car Fur + Dancing Weapon (ff11) eyes. Let me know if i can make better or would wanna see an Alt Skin idea on this type

Yakkha is a Kiranti Tibeto-Burman language spoken by approximately 14,000 people in the Taplejung, Dhankuta, and Sankhuwasabha districts of eastern Nepal. Akha — grouped by Western scholars with Hani and Honi into the Hani language cluster — is a Southern Loloish Tibeto-Burman language spoken by roughly 600,000 people across Yunnan Province in southern China, eastern Myanmar's Shan State, northern Laos, and northern Thailand. On the surface these languages appear geographically remote and linguistically unrelated. Yakkha belongs to the Kiranti branch of Tibeto-Burman; Akha belongs to the Loloish branch. The conventional linguistic classification places them on different sub-branches of the Tibeto-Burman family tree, separated by millennia of divergent evolution. Yet when their grammatical architecture, morphological patterns, and lexical structures are examined in detail — as the Yakkha grammatical data in the tables above permits — a striking series of parallels emerges. These parallels operate at multiple levels: shared cognates from Proto-Tibeto-Burman, structural convergences in how both languages build temporal adverbs, reduplication and ideophonic systems with remarkable architectural similarity, and what appear to be shared contact borrowings from the Shan Tai political world that both communities inhabited before one migrated westward into Nepal. This essay examines these parallels systematically and argues that the similarities between Yakkha and Akha are not coincidental but reflect a period of prolonged geographic and political co-presence in the Burma-Yunnan corridor before the migrations that brought the ancestors of the Yakkha people to Nepal. The proposal here is that the ancestors of the Yakkha-speaking community and the Akha people lived in adjacent territories within the Mong Mao/Mong Kawng political sphere of northern Burma and Yunnan for several centuries — roughly the 13th through 16th centuries — before the collapse of that political world under Toungoo Burmese pressure in 1557 drove the proto-Yakkha community westward through the Assam corridor into Nepal. The similarities examined below reflect both the ancient genealogical connection and this more recent period of contact. **The Temporal Adverb System: =niŋ and the Day Root** The temporal adverb tables from the Yakkha grammar reveal one of the most structurally diagnostic comparisons with Akha. In Yakkha, all temporal adverbs in the first table are derived by attaching the suffix *=niŋ* to a time-denoting root. The resulting forms are: *he?niŋ 'when' | asen-niŋ 'yesterday' | enchoʔniŋ 'day before yesterday' | oncho?niŋ 'long time ago' | kha?niŋ 'this time' | ŋkha?niŋ 'that time' | nam-niŋ 'last year' | chim-niŋ 'two years ago' | khop-niŋ 'three years ago'* The morpheme *=niŋ* functions as a temporal nominalizer — it converts time roots into adverbial expressions. In Akha, the element *ni* (realized variously as *ni, niq, ɲi* across dialects) means 'day' and 'sun,' and functions as a temporal root and classifier throughout the language. The word for 'today' in many Akha varieties is built on this *ni* root. Crucially, Akha also uses this element as a suffix in temporal expressions in a manner architecturally parallel to Yakkha's *=niŋ*. The final *-ŋ* in Yakkha's form represents a common nasal extension of the root — the alternation between *-n* and *-ŋ* final forms is well documented in Tibeto-Burman temporal roots across the family. The Yakkha root *nam* in *nam-niŋ* ('last year') is one of the most significant items in the entire table. The root *nam* for year is a documented cognate across multiple Loloish languages including Akha and Lahu, where *nam* = year is a stable and ancient form. In Yakkha *nam* serves the same semantic function. This is a genuine shared retention from Proto-Tibeto-Burman — not a borrowing and not a coincidence — demonstrating the underlying genealogical connection between the two language communities despite their classification in different branches. The counting of years through numerical prefixes — *chim-niŋ* ('two years ago') and *khop-niŋ* ('three years ago') — embeds numeral roots directly into the temporal adverb form. Akha constructs year-counting expressions through a parallel pattern of attaching numeral classifiers to the year root. The structural logic is identical in both languages: numeral + year/time root = time-depth expression. This architectural parallel in how both languages quantify temporal distance is unlikely to result from coincidence alone. **The hen Root and the wandik Compound: Evidence of Shared Tai Contact** The second temporal table introduces a set of forms built around two key roots: *hen* meaning 'today/this' and *wandik* meaning 'tomorrow/later/next day.' These roots are not temporal suffixes like *=niŋ* but lexical stems forming the base of future-oriented time expressions. The root *hen* for today and present time in Yakkha finds a probable parallel in Hani dialects, where a proximal present-time root *hɛn/hen* appears across several varieties. This is a relatively specific phonological correspondence — not a generic Tibeto-Burman form but a more regionally distributed item suggesting contact-era sharing. Far more significant is the *wandik* root. The element *wan* embedded within *wandik* corresponds to Tai *wan* meaning 'day' — a well-documented Tai loanword that entered Akha and several neighboring languages during the period of Shan political dominance in the Mong Kawng/Mong Mao sphere. In Akha, *wàn* as a day-counting element appears in temporal constructions in a manner closely parallel to its use in Yakkha *wandik*. The critical implication is that both Akha and proto-Yakkha absorbed this same Tai loanword during the same period — the 13th through 16th centuries when both communities were within the Shan political world of northern Burma. A shared Tai borrowing of this specificity is the strongest possible evidence for geographic co-presence during that period. The compound form *wandik-ucumphak* meaning 'some days/time ahead' shows how Yakkha builds future temporal expressions through stacking these roots. The *-phak* element marking future days has parallels in Lahu, where aspirated stop finals mark prospective aspect, and the broader Loloish family uses related forms in future-oriented temporal constructions. That Yakkha employs this *-phak* element in future-day compounds while related forms appear in Lahu and Akha-adjacent languages further suggests the shared contact environment proposed here. **Reduplication Architecture: A Deep Structural Parallel** The reduplication tables from the Yakkha grammar reveal one of the most architecturally significant comparisons with Akha. Both languages deploy reduplication extensively for adjectival and adverbial intensification, and both show the same three-tier reduplication system: full reduplication for intensity and iterativity, partial reduplication for manner expression, and triplication for ideophonic elaboration. In Yakkha, full reduplication of verbal stems produces adjectives expressing physical qualities. The examples from Tables 6.7 and 6.9 show: *cancan 'tall/high' (from cand 'rise up') | chekchek 'deep/low/narrow' | chiŋchiŋ 'tight' | chuŋchuŋ 'wrinkled' | pekpek 'flat/thin/folded' | bumbum 'thickly/swollen' | lumlum 'loudly' | maŋmaŋ 'wondering' | simsim 'squinting/blinking'* In Akha, full reduplication serves identical semantic functions. Akha adjectives and adverbs are regularly reduplicated to express intensity, manner, and physical quality — with the reduplicated form adding emphasis and completeness to the root meaning. The structural logic — verbal or adjectival root doubled to yield intensified quality expression — is the same in both languages. More specifically, the Yakkha pattern of **postnasal voicing in reduplication** is particularly diagnostic. Forms like *bumbum* from the root *pups \~ pum* and *boŋboŋ* from *poks \~ poŋ* show that voicing applies to the initial consonant of the reduplicated form to create maximal phonological identity between base and copy. This nasal-conditioned voicing in reduplication is a feature found across Southern Loloish languages including Akha, where similar postnasal voicing processes operate in reduplicated morphology. The fact that both languages deploy this same phonologically-conditioned voicing in their reduplication systems suggests either shared inheritance of the rule or contact-period convergence. The Yakkha **triplication pattern** (Tables 6.11) is especially striking in the comparative context. Triplication in Yakkha involves a CV base followed by two rhyming syllables that retain the vowel but change the initial consonant to /r/, /l/, or occasionally /t/, /c/, /k/: *tururu '\[blood, tears\] flowing' | hibibi '\[wind\] blowing gently' | khiriri 'spinning/revolving' | philili '\[butterfly\] jitering' | pururu '\[flowing\] in streams' | siliŋliŋ 'shaking'* This triplication pattern — where the first syllable establishes the phonological base and the following two rhyming syllables elaborate it through consonant-change — is documented in Bantawa and Chintang within Kiranti, but the specific /r/ and /l/ liquid consonant change pattern in the rhyming syllables has close parallels in Akha ideophonic elaboration. In Akha, extended ideophonic forms regularly use liquid consonant (/r/, /l/) insertion in rhyming syllables to create sound-symbolic elaboration of the same kind Yakkha deploys in triplication. The cross-linguistic parallel here is not merely in the existence of triplication but in the specific phonological mechanism — liquid elaboration in rhyming syllables — used to achieve the ideophonic effect. **Ideophonic Architecture: Parallel Sensory Domains:** The ideophone tables (Tables 6.11 and 6.12) from the Yakkha grammar reveal a rich inventory of sound-symbolic words covering movement, sound, manner, texture, taste, and sensation. The semantic domains covered by Yakkha ideophones closely parallel those documented in Akha ideophonic vocabulary: Motion and manner of movement in Yakkha: *khobak-khobak* 'crawling,' *hoŋghak-hoŋghak* 'walking with sudden steps,' *taŋpharaŋ-taŋpharaŋ* 'staggering,' *phutruk-phutruk* 'jumping around,' *sototo* 'walking one after the other.' Akha possesses an equally rich set of manner-of-movement ideophones deploying the same phonological strategies — onomatopoeic base plus reduplication — to express nuanced movement qualities. The semantic granularity is comparable: both languages distinguish multiple types of walking, falling, and moving through space with separate ideophonic forms. Sound ideophones in Yakkha: *ghok-ghok* 'pig grunts,' *oenk-oenk* 'buffalo grunts,' *khoʔluk-khoʔluk* 'coughing,' *kyaŋ-kyaŋ* 'barking lightly,' *whaŋ-whaŋ* 'barking loudly,' *phorop-phorop* 'slurping.' Akha animal ideophones and sound-symbolic words for human activities like eating, breathing, and speaking are built through identical reduplication of onomatopoeic bases. The specific phonological shapes — velar stops for grunting sounds, nasals for resonant sounds — show cross-linguistic convergence in how both languages map phonetic features onto semantic categories. Particularly striking is the shared use of **initial aspirated stops and breathy phonation** in ideophones expressing dispersal, expulsion, or sudden release in both languages. Yakkha *phoplek* ('\[pouring out\] at once'), *phururu* ('\[manner of\] strewing/dispersing'), *phelele* ('\[bird flying\] up high') all deploy initial *ph-* in ideophones expressing outward movement or dispersal. Akha similarly uses initial aspirated stops in ideophones expressing expulsion, dispersal, and sudden outward movement. The phonosemantic mapping — *ph-* = dispersal/expulsion — appears to be shared across both languages, suggesting either common inheritance of the phonosemantic association or contact-era reinforcement of the pattern. The Yakkha ideophone *ʈhwaŋ* ('sudden bad smell') employs a retroflex aspirated stop — a marked and unusual phonological feature. The presence of retroflexion in Yakkha ideophones, and its specific association with sensory intensity, parallels the use of marked consonants in Akha ideophonic vocabulary to signal perceptual salience or unpleasantness. Both languages deploy their most marked phonological features preferentially in ideophonic and expressive vocabulary, suggesting a shared functional-phonological strategy for indexing experiential intensity. **Morphological Architecture: The a- Prefix and Noun-Verb Compounds** One of the most structurally significant parallels between Yakkha and Akha involves their prefix systems. Akha's morphological system, as documented by Inga-Lill Hansson, is notable for its limited affixation. The only widespread affixes in the modern Akha vernacular are the prefix *a-* and the suffix *-ma*. The *a-* prefix serves as a general noun-modifying and adjectival prefix across a wide range of Akha vocabulary. In the Yakkha ideophone table (Table 6.10), the prefix *e-* appears in a series of reduplicated forms: *iblik-iblik*, *simik-simik*, *ekhik-ekhik*, *ekhumdu-ekhumdu*, *emaŋdu-emaŋdu*, *esap-esap*, *elok-elok*. The grammar notes this marker occurs only in reduplicated forms and is attested in Belhare as marking extension. The vowel *e-/a-* noun/adjective prefix appearing specifically in expressive and intensified forms in Yakkha is architecturally parallel to Akha's *a-* prefix, which similarly marks adjectival and expressive forms. Both prefixes appear to derive from the same Proto-Tibeto-Burman source — a reduced vowel prefix marking descriptive and adjectival categories — and their parallel preservation and function in both Yakkha and Akha is a significant genealogical connection. The Akha noun-verb compound construction documented by Hansson — the 'ABB structure' where a noun object takes a verb with the same phonetic shape as its second syllable, creating cognate object constructions — parallels the Yakkha pattern of experiential verb compounds. Yakkha forms like *luŋma-tukt* 'love' (literally 'heart-squeeze'), *pomma-keʔ* 'get lazy,' *hakamba-keʔ* 'yawn' combine a nominal first element (body part or sensation noun) with a verbal second element. Akha constructs a parallel class of body-part noun plus verb compounds for internal states and physical sensations. Both languages use this noun-verb compounding strategy as the primary morphological mechanism for expressing psychological and physiological experience — a shared architectural preference that goes beyond typological accident. **. Phonological Parallels: Glottal Features and the Consonant Inventory** Both Yakkha and Akha show a distinctive treatment of glottal features that sets them apart from many of their respective linguistic neighbors. In Akha, the glottal stop */ʔ/* is described as often realized as 'glottal tension' rather than a true stop — a laryngealized phonation type that characterizes a significant portion of the lexicon. Akha distinguishes laryngealized ('A type') from breathy ('B type') phonation as a lexically contrastive feature cutting across its entire vocabulary. In Yakkha, glottal stops appear prominently in the ideophonic vocabulary and in several core lexical items. The Yakkha tables show forms like *khoʔluk-khoʔluk* (coughing), *boʔle-boʔle* (stammering), and *laŋ-kheʔwa* (toe: leg-finger) where the glottal stop */ʔ/* appears as a phonologically active element. The grammar notes that the glottal stop never occurs word-finally in Yakkha and is replaced by /k/ in that position — a phonological restriction that parallels Akha's constraints on syllable-final consonants, where native Akha syllables ending in non-vowel material can only close in *-m* or *-ɔŋ*. Both languages also share a tendency toward **voiced initial obstruents in ideophonic and expressive vocabulary** despite restrictions on voiced initials in their core lexicons. Yakkha's grammar explicitly notes that voiced initials like /b/ are rare in the core lexicon but appear in ideophones — and that initials such as /gh/ and /bh/ are found only beyond the ideophone register. **The co-compound System and Kinship Terminology** The co-compound table from the Yakkha grammar (Table 5.1) shows a system of paired synonymous or near-synonymous roots combined to express a higher-order concept: *pa-pum 'male ancestor' (father + grandfather) | ma-mum 'female ancestor' (mother + grandmother) | na-nuncha 'sisters' (elder sister + younger sibling) | yakkhaba-yakkhama 'Yakkha people' (Yakkha man + Yakkha woman)* This co-compound system — where two roots of related or contrasting meaning are paired to express a superordinate or collective concept — is a characteristic feature of Tibeto-Burman languages across the family. It is particularly well developed in Loloish languages including Akha, where paired root compounds for kinship terms, collective nouns, and abstract concepts are structurally identical in their formation logic to the Yakkha examples above. The specific *pa/ma* gendered ancestor marking is especially significant. Akha uses *pa* for male/father and *ma* for female/mother as the fundamental kinship roots — phonetically identical to Yakkha's *pa* and *ma* in *pa-pum* and *ma-mum*. These forms are ancient Proto-Tibeto-Burman retentions, but their preservation in both Yakkha and Akha with identical phonological form and identical functional role in co-compound kinship terminology is a significant shared feature. The reduplication-like pattern in *pa-pum* (father-grandfather, with vowel change) and *ma-mum* (mother-grandmother, with vowel change) parallels Akha's use of vowel-alternating co-compounds for expressing generational depth in kinship — both languages use the same phonological strategy of vowel alternation within a paired root to signal 'more ancestral' or 'higher generation **The -lik \~ -lek Diminutive and Manner Suffix** The Yakkha *-lik \~ -lek* suffix (Table 6.6) deserves separate analysis. This morpheme attaches to verbal stems to create manner adverbs expressing the completeness or proper execution of the verbal action: *iplik 'properly \[twisted\]' | hiklik 'turned around/upside down' | phoplek '\[pouring out\] at once' | siklik '\[dying\] at once' | hobrek '\[rotten\] completely' | wakurik 'bent/crooked'* The grammar notes that cognates of this marker exist in other Kiranti languages — *-let* in Athpare and *-cilet* in Belhare. But the *-lik/-lek* form in Yakkha has a broader comparative relevance. In Loloish languages including Lahu and several Akha dialects, a *-lɛk/-lek* element appears as a completive or resultative verbal suffix marking the full achievement of the verbal action — semantically parallel to Yakkha's *-lik \~ -lek* which adds emphasis to the result of the verbal action. The phonological correspondence *-lik \~ -lek* (Yakkha) :: *-lɛk/-lek* (Loloish) is close enough to suggest either shared retention from Proto-Tibeto-Burman or contact-era reinforcement of the form and function during the period of geographic co-presence in the Burma-Yunnan corridor. **Conclusion** The Yakkha language of eastern Nepal and the Akha language of Yunnan, Myanmar, and Thailand are not sister languages and are not immediately mutually intelligible. But their grammatical architectures, temporal adverb systems, reduplication patterns, ideophonic strategies, kinship co-compound systems, and specific shared roots tell a coherent story. They are languages shaped by the same ancient Proto-Tibeto-Burman ancestor, developed in geographic proximity during the Mong Mao/Mong Kawng political era of the 13th through 16th centuries, and separated by the same historical catastrophe — the Toungoo Burmese destruction of the Shan sawbwa system between 1557 and 1563 — that sent one community westward into the Himalayan hills while the other remained in the mountains of Yunnan, Myanmar, and Thailand. The linguistic fossils of their shared period are visible in the Yakkha grammar tables analyzed here: the *=niŋ* temporal suffix parallel to Akha's *ni* day root, the *wan* Tai loanword shared in both languages' temporal vocabulary, the liquid-consonant triplication strategy in ideophones, the *a-/e-* prefix in expressive morphology, the *nam* year root, the *pa/ma* kinship co-compound system, and the parallel phonosemantic mapping of marked consonants onto expressive intensity. Together these constitute a linguistic record of a shared history that the oral traditions of the Limbu, Rai, and Yakkha peoples themselves preserve: the memory of Mongmaorong, the kingdom of Pong, the sawbwas who were killed and the taxes that were imposed, and the ten kings who led their people westward through the mountains to the hills of Nepal where their descendants live today.

Vajdaságban és Ausztriában közel hasonló lélekszámú a magyarság, \~150 ezer fő. Vadjaságban a Concordia Minoritas Hungaricae ( [https://levelszavazat.rs/](https://levelszavazat.rs/) ) és a helyi magyar kisebbségi párt szervezi a levélszavazással kapcsolatos összes teendőt, a regisztrációtól a választások előtti hetekben kopogtatásig és a Fideszes szavazatok összegyűjtéséig **minden településen**, ahol működik a CMH. [https://atlatszo.hu/kozugy/2022/03/29/ket-valasztas-kishegyesen-az-idosek-az-elhunytak-es-a-kulfoldon-elok-levelszavazataival-is-csalnak-a-vajdasagban/](https://atlatszo.hu/kozugy/2022/03/29/ket-valasztas-kishegyesen-az-idosek-az-elhunytak-es-a-kulfoldon-elok-levelszavazataival-is-csalnak-a-vajdasagban/) [https://www.szabadeuropa.hu/a/magyar-valasztasok-szerbiaban-a-nem-fideszes-valasztok-eltunt-szavazolapjai/31775828.html](https://www.szabadeuropa.hu/a/magyar-valasztasok-szerbiaban-a-nem-fideszes-valasztok-eltunt-szavazolapjai/31775828.html) Ehhez képest Ausztriában mindössze kettő helyen, Bécsben és Innsbruckban szavazhatnak a magyarok, magyar lakcím nélkül pedig levélben.

Hi all - first of all I love this subreddit - I read it everyday (but rarely comment as you usually answer quite well before I get a chance). I have a pretty sophisticated Excel file that projects my investments/net worth into the future and works out if my retirement plan is feasible using the assumptions in the grey box. Here is my setup for info: Age: 25, married with 1 kid Salary: £60-65k Pension: Currently £16k. Contributing £346/m and employer £520/m ISA: £4k - Currently only £50/m. Planning on building to £500/m contribution over next 3 years. Home: £150k with £115k mortgage (£630/m) Debt: £25k at £660/m until 2030 (bought car and covered part of wedding). Planning to avoid any future debt. This payment can go towards ISA after it's paid off, but I likely will also need to use it to save for our next car. I have a lot of expenses coming my way and an emergency fund to fill, but this isn't my question. Some info on Excel file: \- It assumes investment contributions increase in line with salary growth rate \- it includes option to change when to pay off mortgage (you can spike in income at 59 when this is done). It seems it's best for me to pay it off when I have access to my pension, instead of using the ISA (which is the limiting factor). With this option, the mortgage repayment is added to the goal retirement income in the calculations. \- I have part time income included so I can barista FIRE at 45, instead of full FIRE in my 50s. \- The state pension % of today accounts for a devaluation in state pension income. 50% effectively says it's worth £12k for 2 people in real terms. \- I have left the excel in nominal terms as I think it's easier to understand this way - but does have ability to inflation adjust it if anyone would find that view helpful. Other than some general opinions, I'm wondering what you would suggesting in this situation knowing that the limitation on FIRE is how much I can get into my ISA, and that my pension is set to have £150k too much in it at the point of barista FIRE. I want to take more income home so I can put into the ISA, but with my income where it is I'm trying to stay below £60k to keep child benefit, and stay as low as possible to avoid having too much income taxed at 40%. But increasing my pension contribution seems like a poor use of money. Considering buying 5 days of annual leave each year too just as it's tax efficient and gives me more freedom. Two things that aren't included right now which may have an impact: \- I will upgrade the house and likely take out a 100-150k mortgage around age 40 to get into a more retirement style home we dream of. I will likely max out the term of the mortgage and pay off at pension access age (using up the surplus pension value). \- I'm paying off almost £250 a month of student loans, which will have it cleared before 2035. At this point I can use this money towards ISA. Thanks in advance! And let me know if you have any questions.