For Hyperliquid I’d usually quote it as a USDC-onboarding problem, not a random ERC-20 bridge problem.
The cleaner route is often: swap the token to USDC where liquidity is deepest, deposit/bridge the USDC through the supported Hyperliquid path, then rebuy or trade inside Hyperliquid if that is the goal. Trying to preserve the exact ERC-20 through every hop is where the solver spread gets ugly.
For a larger move, compare routes by final account balance after all swaps and bridge fees, not the bridge fee line by itself. Li.Fi/Jumper/Bungee are useful for quotes, but I would still sanity-check the USDC-first path manually before sending size.
Show full