I’m a video producer managing a team of 3 and we just switched from Wrike to Monday.com since the rest of the company uses it. We us ziflow which by itself is a passable review tool but it’s not native to Monday and the review tasks are completely disjointed from the monday tasks. We’re also really struggling with search. Like it just won’t bring us to the tasks we need and we’re constantly scrolling or getting lost. The desktop App is next to useless. Can’t create tabs, functionality seems worse than the web. Speed on both is abysmal. Is this PMS just not made for larger teams? It feels unintuitive to creatives if not downright hostile. I know this just sounds like flat out bitching but I’m really looking for some help or resources. Are there gurus out there worth following? Should I just lean 100% in to the AI to avoid having to interface with the other tools. The rest of my team is feeling it and the whole creative dept is about to throw a fit. /rant. Please help.

I don't know how ZiFlow does it, but I find Figma comments to be a bit... scattered. I can imagine for a non-designer that's not always in the trenches of the files that they'll lose track or miss things (even the feeling of that is not great). It wouldn't be so bad if they had a consolidated view or proper tracking system (doesn't even have to be robust like Jira, but something like GitHub Issues), but as it stands, it's not very scalable and doesn't feel surfaced. If you're a small team then it's passable at best. Hope they can make this part better.

What job are they actually trying to do when they give feedback? That matters because Figma is natural for designers, but to a PM or client it can feel like being dropped into the workshop instead of the review room. Too many panels, frames, versions, comments, weird zoom levels. ZiFlow probably works because it says: look here, comment here, approve here. I’d keep Figma as the source of truth, but package reviews for non-designers: one prototype link, clear instructions, limited scope, maybe a Loom-style walkthrough. Don’t make them navigate your workspace if all you need is feedback.

From a proofreader and copy editor’s standpoint, **Workfront Proof is a** ***nightmare*** **to use**—clunky, buggy, and astonishingly inefficient. You won’t find many honest reviews online, largely because **Adobe is extremely effective at burying or removing them**. **Ziflow**, by contrast, is painless. I can’t speak to its full functionality or compliance features, but from a day‑to‑day production perspective, it’s miles ahead. What I *can* speak to is this: **Adobe’s sales team is very persuasive**, and too often, management signs off on Workfront Proof (and Workfront in general) without ever testing the tool with the people who will actually use it. The result is predictable—the staff left to work in it are the ones stuck dealing with the bugs, the convoluted workflows, and the hours lost to inefficiency. In that sense, **Workfront Proof isn’t just inconvenient—it’s a costly, time‑consuming mistake**. Let's see how long this comment manages to stay up...